Adventures in Reading

Renewing America’s Food Traditions - Center for Sustainable Environments at Northern Arizona University

May 2, 2008 · 1 Comment

As I mentioned earlier this week, I’m very excited to read Renewing America’s Food Traditions: Saving and Savoring the Continent’s Most Endangered Foods by Gary Paul Nabhan and to learn all about the history of and how to cook all sorts of interesting ingredients such as Sonoran white pomegranate (Chili Pepper Nation), Zimmerman pawpaw (Crab Cake Nation), Magnum Bonum apple (Corn Bread Nation), Snake River Chinook salmon (Salmon Nation), Acorns of the Englemen Oak (Acorn Nation), Seneca hominy flint corn (Maple Syrup Nation), Narragansett turkey (Clambake Nation), and the pre-Civil War peanut (Gumbo Nation).

But before I went out and bought the book (or rather pre-ordering it on Amazon.com), I found this site that shows that Renewing America’s Food Traditions (RAFT) has previously published in a stripped down list of endangered plants and animals with brief histories of just the most endangered species (without pretty photos or recipes) by the Center for Sustainable Environments at Northern Arizona University. I think the image above was the cover to that publication; as you can the subtitle is different. In this case it is Bringing Cultural and Culinary Mainstays from the Past into the New Millenium.

And you can download this older RAFT publication Center for Sustainable Environments at Northern Arizona University by clicking here!

They even provide a downloadable publication of the Seafood Traditions at Risk in Northern America!

What I found interesting about finding this site, is the list of some of the ancient and indigenous cultures that the foods were eaten by (Mandan, Arikara, Hidatsa, Seminole, Iroquois, Cherokee, Sahaptin, Chumash, O’odham, Cocopa, Quechan, Hopi, Navajo, Santo Domingo, and Taos) and the place-based immigrant cultures that these foods came from (such as Amish, Mennonite, Hutterite, Cajun, Creole, Hispanic, Connecticut Yankee, Florida Cracker, Pennsylvania Dutch, and Appalachian Scots-Irish). This information was not in the NYTimes article featuring Renewing America’s Food Traditions and while I’d assume that it is in the new publication, who knows?

This site also lists the reasons why it is important to maintain the diversity of America’s edible plants, animals, and their food traditions:

Ecological Benefits: plant and animal diversity sustains healthy ecological relationships; sustainable agricultural practices which support plant and animal diversity encourage resistance to pest and diseases also ensuring food security.

Gastronomic Benefits: inherent in a diversity of foods is a variety of aromas, textures, and flavors.

Cultural Benefits: preservation of traditional knowledge and sustainable production.

Health & Nutrition Benefits: resistance to disease including diabetes and heart disease.

Also, I found this lovely RAFT Regional Map of North America’s Place-based Foods on the Slow Food U.S.A. website.

On the Slow Food U.S.A. website, you can also download a publication about Renewing the Native Food Traditions of Bison Nation and the Directory of Native American Food Producers, Chefs, Caterers and Supporting Non-Profits: Where to Purchase Traditional Foods of the Indigenous Peoples of North America.

I think I will still go out and purchase the Chelsea Green publication of Renewing America’s Food Traditions, but it’s nice to be able to download Nabhan’s comprehensive list of endangered plants and animals that were once fairly commonplace in American kitchens but are now threatened, endangered or basically extinct in the marketplace (even if it may be a bit outdated).

Categories: American History · Food · History · NYTimes · Renewing America’s Food Traditions
Tagged: , ,

The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less by Barry Schwartz

May 2, 2008 · 1 Comment

Last night I finished Barry Schwartz’s The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less, the final book in my informal study of positive psychology and the science and economics of happiness. The other books I read were:

And the ones I intend to read later this year on this topic are:

Anyway, I enjoy reading many books in one subject area to really learn a lot from different sources. What’s great about this is that each book in the subject area gets easier to read as you become more familiar with the terms specific to that topic. But along with that comes the feeling that every book is kind of the same!

I’d say that while The Paradox of Choice does mention research done by Martin E. P. Seligman (Authentic Happiness), Sonja Lyubomirsky (The How of Happiness) and Robert H. Frank (The Economic Naturalist and Choosing the Right Pond), this book is most like Daniel Gilbert’s Stumbling on Happiness.

That’s because Stumbling on Happiness and The Paradox of Choice both focus most on the idea that what people think makes them happy is not what actually makes them happy.

I really enjoyed Stumbling on Happiness, more than The Paradox of Choice, though I suspect that may simply be because of the order in which I read them; thus The Paradox of Choice no longer seems fresh or innovative.

I also suspect that the reason I was not overly impressed by The Paradox of Choice is because this book was published in 2004 and now in 2008, many of the findings in this book are commonly accepted and well known. For example, I’ve read many articles in the NYTimes in recent years about the idea that fewer choices lead to a boost in happiness though most people believe that more choices equals greater happiness (sometimes called the tyranny of choice):

Okay, well I didn’t realize that Schwartz himself wrote many of these NYTimes pieces…still that definitely explains why the material did not seem fresh to me. I felt the same way when I read Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner, when I was consciously aware of having read many of the examples from the book in NYTimes articles by the authors.

Anyway, I don’t want to give you the impression that I didn’t like The Paradox of Choice. I did enjoy it, I just didn’t find it as exciting as many of the other books I’ve read lately on positive psychology and the psychology and economics of happiness.

If you’re interested in finding out more, click here to check out this PBS interview with Schwartz.

And if my comparison to Stumbling on Happiness has intrigued you, click here to read the NYTimes review or here to read an excerpt.

Categories: Authentic Happiness · Freakonomics · NYTimes · Positive Psychology · Psychology · Reading · Social Psychology · The Happiness Hypothesis · The How of Happiness · The Paradox of Choice
Tagged: ,